{"id":2545731,"date":"2023-06-10T15:44:04","date_gmt":"2023-06-10T19:44:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/former-vp-of-cybersecurity-startup-bitwarden-terminated-for-using-unconventional-preferred-pronoun-assigned-by-god-files-lawsuit-against-employer\/"},"modified":"2023-06-10T15:44:04","modified_gmt":"2023-06-10T19:44:04","slug":"former-vp-of-cybersecurity-startup-bitwarden-terminated-for-using-unconventional-preferred-pronoun-assigned-by-god-files-lawsuit-against-employer","status":"publish","type":"platowire","link":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/former-vp-of-cybersecurity-startup-bitwarden-terminated-for-using-unconventional-preferred-pronoun-assigned-by-god-files-lawsuit-against-employer\/","title":{"rendered":"Former VP of cybersecurity startup Bitwarden terminated for using unconventional preferred pronoun ‘Assigned By God’; files lawsuit against employer"},"content":{"rendered":"

In recent years, the use of preferred pronouns has become a hot topic in the workplace. Many companies have implemented policies to ensure that employees are addressed by the pronouns they prefer, as a way to create a more inclusive and respectful environment. However, a recent case involving a former VP of cybersecurity startup Bitwarden has brought attention to the issue of unconventional preferred pronouns.<\/p>\n

The former VP, who has not been named in media reports, was terminated from their position after using the preferred pronoun “Assigned By God” instead of traditional pronouns like he\/him or she\/her. The individual, who identifies as non-binary, claimed that this was their preferred pronoun and that they had the right to be addressed in this way.<\/p>\n

Bitwarden, however, disagreed and terminated the individual’s employment. The company stated that the use of unconventional pronouns was not in line with their policies and that it could cause confusion and discomfort among other employees.<\/p>\n

Following their termination, the former VP filed a lawsuit against Bitwarden, claiming discrimination based on gender identity. The case is ongoing, and it remains to be seen how it will be resolved.<\/p>\n

This case raises several important questions about the use of preferred pronouns in the workplace. While many companies have policies in place to ensure that employees are addressed by their preferred pronouns, what happens when an individual’s preferred pronoun is unconventional or unfamiliar?<\/p>\n

Some argue that companies should be more flexible in their approach to preferred pronouns and should allow individuals to choose the pronoun that feels most comfortable for them. Others argue that unconventional pronouns can cause confusion and discomfort among other employees and may not be appropriate for a professional setting.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, the issue of preferred pronouns is a complex one that requires careful consideration and sensitivity. Companies must balance the rights of individuals to express their gender identity with the need to maintain a professional and respectful workplace environment.<\/p>\n

As this case continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how it is resolved and what impact it may have on the use of preferred pronouns in the workplace. Regardless of the outcome, it is clear that this is an issue that will continue to be debated and discussed in the years to come.<\/p>\n