{"id":2564526,"date":"2023-09-01T15:50:21","date_gmt":"2023-09-01T19:50:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/change-lendings-decertification-for-non-qm-loans-reversed-by-judge\/"},"modified":"2023-09-01T15:50:21","modified_gmt":"2023-09-01T19:50:21","slug":"change-lendings-decertification-for-non-qm-loans-reversed-by-judge","status":"publish","type":"platowire","link":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/change-lendings-decertification-for-non-qm-loans-reversed-by-judge\/","title":{"rendered":"Change Lending\u2019s decertification for non-QM loans reversed by judge"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Change Lending, a prominent mortgage lender, recently received a favorable ruling from a judge, reversing its decertification for non-qualified mortgage (non-QM) loans. This decision has significant implications for both the company and the broader mortgage lending industry.<\/p>\n

Non-QM loans are mortgages that do not meet the criteria set by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for qualified mortgages. These loans are typically offered to borrowers who may not meet the strict requirements of traditional mortgages, such as self-employed individuals or those with unique financial situations.<\/p>\n

Change Lending, like many other lenders, had been offering non-QM loans to cater to this underserved market. However, in a surprising move, the company’s certification to issue these loans was revoked by the CFPB, citing concerns over compliance with lending regulations.<\/p>\n

The decertification had a significant impact on Change Lending’s operations. It not only affected their ability to offer non-QM loans but also tarnished their reputation in the industry. The company faced a decline in business and struggled to regain its footing.<\/p>\n

However, Change Lending decided to challenge the CFPB’s decision in court, hoping for a reversal of the decertification. After a lengthy legal battle, a judge ruled in favor of the lender, stating that the CFPB’s decision was arbitrary and lacked sufficient evidence to support the revocation.<\/p>\n

This ruling is a significant victory for Change Lending and other lenders who offer non-QM loans. It reaffirms their ability to serve borrowers who do not fit into the traditional mortgage lending mold. It also highlights the importance of fair and evidence-based decision-making by regulatory bodies like the CFPB.<\/p>\n

The reversal of Change Lending’s decertification has broader implications for the mortgage lending industry as well. It sends a message that lenders should not be discouraged from offering non-QM loans as long as they comply with existing regulations. This ruling may encourage other lenders to continue or even expand their non-QM loan offerings, providing more options for borrowers who do not meet the strict criteria of qualified mortgages.<\/p>\n

Additionally, this decision may prompt the CFPB to review and potentially revise its guidelines for non-QM loans. The judge’s ruling suggests that the current criteria for qualified mortgages may be too rigid and exclude deserving borrowers. A more flexible approach to non-QM loans could help bridge the gap between traditional mortgage lending and the needs of certain borrowers.<\/p>\n

However, it is important to note that the ruling does not mean that non-QM loans are without risks. These loans often come with higher interest rates and fees to compensate for the increased risk taken by lenders. Borrowers considering non-QM loans should carefully evaluate their financial situation and explore all available options before making a decision.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, Change Lending’s successful challenge of its decertification for non-QM loans is a significant development in the mortgage lending industry. It highlights the importance of fair and evidence-based decision-making by regulatory bodies and provides hope for lenders and borrowers seeking alternative mortgage options. As the industry moves forward, it will be interesting to see how this ruling influences the future of non-QM lending and whether it prompts changes in the existing regulations.<\/p>\n