{"id":2583609,"date":"2023-11-03T09:00:40","date_gmt":"2023-11-03T14:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/the-lawsuit-seeking-to-end-federal-cannabis-prohibition-falls-short-of-completely-ending-federal-cannabis-prohibition\/"},"modified":"2023-11-03T09:00:40","modified_gmt":"2023-11-03T14:00:40","slug":"the-lawsuit-seeking-to-end-federal-cannabis-prohibition-falls-short-of-completely-ending-federal-cannabis-prohibition","status":"publish","type":"platowire","link":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/the-lawsuit-seeking-to-end-federal-cannabis-prohibition-falls-short-of-completely-ending-federal-cannabis-prohibition\/","title":{"rendered":"The Lawsuit Seeking to End Federal Cannabis Prohibition Falls Short of Completely Ending Federal Cannabis Prohibition"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Lawsuit Seeking to End Federal Cannabis Prohibition Falls Short of Completely Ending Federal Cannabis Prohibition
In recent years, the movement to legalize cannabis has gained significant momentum across the United States. As more states have legalized the recreational or medicinal use of cannabis, questions have arisen about the legality of federal cannabis prohibition. A recent lawsuit aimed at challenging the federal government’s authority to prohibit cannabis has garnered attention, but unfortunately, it falls short of completely ending federal cannabis prohibition.
The lawsuit, known as Washington v. Barr, was filed in 2019 by a group of cannabis advocates and patients in the state of Washington. The plaintiffs argued that the federal government’s classification of cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance, alongside drugs like heroin and LSD, is unconstitutional and violates their rights. They contended that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate cannabis within states that have legalized its use.
While the lawsuit raised important constitutional questions, it ultimately fell short of achieving its goal of completely ending federal cannabis prohibition. In February 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case, leaving intact the federal government’s authority to enforce cannabis prohibition.
One of the main reasons why the lawsuit failed to achieve its objective is rooted in the legal framework surrounding federalism. Under the U.S. Constitution, the federal government possesses the power to regulate interstate commerce. This power has been interpreted broadly by courts, allowing the federal government to regulate activities that have even a minimal impact on interstate commerce. Since cannabis is still illegal at the federal level, it falls under this broad regulatory authority.
Furthermore, the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), passed by Congress in 1970, classifies cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance. This classification means that cannabis is considered to have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. Despite mounting evidence to the contrary, including numerous studies highlighting the medical benefits of cannabis, the CSA has not been amended to reflect these findings.
To completely end federal cannabis prohibition, a change in federal law is necessary. This would require an act of Congress to either remove cannabis from the list of controlled substances or reclassify it to a lower schedule. While there have been efforts in Congress to pass legislation that would achieve this, such as the MORE Act (Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act), progress has been slow.
The MORE Act, which passed the House of Representatives in December 2020, seeks to decriminalize cannabis at the federal level and expunge prior convictions related to cannabis offenses. However, the bill has yet to be taken up by the Senate, and its fate remains uncertain.
In the absence of congressional action, individual states have taken the lead in legalizing cannabis for both medical and recreational use. As of now, 36 states have legalized medical cannabis, while 18 states and Washington D.C. have also legalized recreational use. This patchwork of state laws creates a complex legal landscape where cannabis is legal within certain jurisdictions but remains illegal under federal law.
While the lawsuit Washington v. Barr may not have achieved its ultimate goal of completely ending federal cannabis prohibition, it has brought attention to the issue and sparked important conversations about the conflict between state and federal laws. As public opinion continues to shift in favor of cannabis legalization, it is likely that further legal challenges and legislative efforts will arise in the future. Only time will tell if federal cannabis prohibition will eventually come to an end.<\/p>\n