{"id":2587733,"date":"2023-11-17T15:26:00","date_gmt":"2023-11-17T20:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/judge-denies-trumps-mistrial-request-in-250-million-new-york-fraud-case\/"},"modified":"2023-11-17T15:26:00","modified_gmt":"2023-11-17T20:26:00","slug":"judge-denies-trumps-mistrial-request-in-250-million-new-york-fraud-case","status":"publish","type":"platowire","link":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/judge-denies-trumps-mistrial-request-in-250-million-new-york-fraud-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge denies Trump\u2019s mistrial request in $250 million New York fraud case"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

In a recent development in the ongoing legal battles surrounding former President Donald Trump, a judge has denied his request for a mistrial in a $250 million fraud case in New York. This decision comes as a blow to Trump’s legal team, who had hoped to have the case dismissed due to alleged misconduct by the prosecution.<\/p>\n

The case in question revolves around allegations that Trump defrauded investors in his company, Trump University. The now-defunct institution promised to teach students the secrets of real estate success but has faced numerous lawsuits from former students who claim they were misled and left with substantial financial losses.<\/p>\n

Trump’s defense team argued that the case should be declared a mistrial due to the alleged misconduct of the prosecution. They claimed that the lead prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney John Gleeson, had made prejudicial statements during his closing arguments, which could have influenced the jury’s decision.<\/p>\n

However, Judge Loretta Preska, who presided over the case, disagreed with Trump’s defense team and denied their request for a mistrial. In her ruling, she stated that while some of Gleeson’s statements may have been inappropriate, they did not rise to the level of misconduct that would warrant a mistrial.<\/p>\n

This decision is significant as it means that the case will proceed to the next phase, where the jury will deliberate and ultimately decide whether Trump is guilty of fraud. If found guilty, he could face significant financial penalties and potential damage to his reputation.<\/p>\n

The denial of Trump’s mistrial request also highlights the challenges he faces in navigating the legal system as a former president. While in office, Trump enjoyed certain legal protections and privileges, but now he must face legal proceedings like any other citizen.<\/p>\n

This case is just one of many legal battles Trump is currently facing. He is also under investigation for potential tax fraud and other financial improprieties by both state and federal authorities. These legal challenges pose a significant threat to Trump’s post-presidential life and could have far-reaching consequences for his business empire and political aspirations.<\/p>\n

The denial of the mistrial request in the $250 million fraud case is a setback for Trump, but it is important to note that it does not determine his guilt or innocence. The jury will ultimately decide his fate based on the evidence presented during the trial.<\/p>\n

As this case continues to unfold, it will undoubtedly attract significant media attention and further fuel the ongoing debate surrounding Trump’s business practices and ethics. The outcome of this trial could have broader implications for how former presidents are held accountable for their actions after leaving office.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, the denial of Trump’s mistrial request in the $250 million fraud case in New York is a significant development in his legal battles. It means that the case will proceed to the jury phase, where they will determine whether Trump is guilty of defrauding investors in Trump University. This decision underscores the challenges Trump faces as a former president navigating the legal system and highlights the potential consequences he may face if found guilty.<\/p>\n