{"id":2604784,"date":"2024-01-26T19:11:26","date_gmt":"2024-01-27T00:11:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/emas-chmp-declines-renewal-of-translarna-and-rejects-nezglyal-and-syfovre-as-new-medicines\/"},"modified":"2024-01-26T19:11:26","modified_gmt":"2024-01-27T00:11:26","slug":"emas-chmp-declines-renewal-of-translarna-and-rejects-nezglyal-and-syfovre-as-new-medicines","status":"publish","type":"platowire","link":"https:\/\/platoai.gbaglobal.org\/platowire\/emas-chmp-declines-renewal-of-translarna-and-rejects-nezglyal-and-syfovre-as-new-medicines\/","title":{"rendered":"EMA\u2019s CHMP Declines Renewal of Translarna and Rejects Nezglyal and Syfovre as New Medicines"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

EMA’s CHMP Declines Renewal of Translarna and Rejects Nezglyal and Syfovre as New Medicines<\/p>\n

The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recently made some significant decisions regarding the approval and renewal of certain medicines. In a recent announcement, the CHMP declined to renew the marketing authorization for Translarna and rejected Nezglyal and Syfovre as new medicines.<\/p>\n

Translarna, also known as ataluren, is a medicine used to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) caused by a specific genetic mutation. It was initially granted conditional approval in 2014 based on promising early data. However, the CHMP has now decided not to renew its marketing authorization due to concerns about the medicine’s effectiveness.<\/p>\n

The decision was based on the results of a study that failed to demonstrate a clinically relevant benefit of Translarna compared to placebo in slowing down the decline in walking ability in DMD patients. The CHMP concluded that the available data did not provide sufficient evidence of the medicine’s effectiveness, leading to the decision not to renew its marketing authorization.<\/p>\n

This decision has raised concerns among patient advocacy groups and families affected by DMD, as Translarna was one of the few available treatment options for this rare and debilitating disease. The EMA has stated that patients currently receiving Translarna can continue their treatment until alternative options are available.<\/p>\n

In addition to Translarna, the CHMP also rejected two new medicines, Nezglyal and Syfovre, for different reasons. Nezglyal, developed by a pharmaceutical company for the treatment of a rare neurological disorder called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), was rejected due to insufficient evidence of its effectiveness.<\/p>\n

The CHMP found that the available data from clinical trials did not convincingly demonstrate Nezglyal’s ability to slow down the progression of ALS or improve patients’ quality of life. The committee highlighted the need for more robust evidence before considering its approval.<\/p>\n

Similarly, Syfovre, a medicine intended for the treatment of a rare genetic disorder called familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS), was rejected due to concerns about its safety. The CHMP raised concerns about the potential risk of serious side effects associated with Syfovre, including liver damage.<\/p>\n

The rejection of these two medicines highlights the rigorous evaluation process that new drugs undergo before receiving approval. The CHMP’s decisions are based on a thorough assessment of the available data on a medicine’s efficacy, safety, and quality. These evaluations aim to ensure that patients receive safe and effective treatments.<\/p>\n

While the rejection of Translarna and the two new medicines may be disappointing for patients and their families, it is important to remember that these decisions are made in the interest of patient safety and based on scientific evidence. The EMA continues to encourage pharmaceutical companies to conduct robust clinical trials and provide comprehensive data to support the approval of new medicines.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, the EMA’s CHMP has declined to renew the marketing authorization for Translarna and rejected Nezglyal and Syfovre as new medicines. These decisions were made based on concerns about the effectiveness of Translarna and insufficient evidence for Nezglyal’s efficacy and safety issues with Syfovre. The EMA’s rigorous evaluation process ensures that patients receive safe and effective treatments, although it may lead to disappointments in certain cases.<\/p>\n